
Financial Review
Portfolio Analysis

|
 |
Financial Review
Financial highlights
Adjusted diluted net asset value per share up 12.5%
Portfolio valuation up 4.7%
Progressive dividend up 8.2% for the year
Adjusted diluted earnings per share up 33.0%
Total return on adjusted diluted net assets per share for year 14.1%
Operating performance
Gross rental income, including our share of joint ventures, increased by
2.5% (£14.0 million) to £565.6 million (2003: £551.6 million). Rents from
properties wholly owned by the Group increased by £37.3 million,
whereas our share of joint ventures’ gross rents reduced by £23.3 million
following the buyout of GUS plc’s interest in BL Universal and taking full
control of BVP Developments.
Group net rental income increased by 7.6% (£31.7 million) to
£450.3 million (2003: £418.6 million). Factors increasing net rental
income included rent reviews and new lettings (£36.9 million), the
consolidation of former joint ventures (£29.4 million) and purchases
(£10.9 million). Reductions in net rental income arose from the restructured
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lease
(£5.9 million) reflecting commencement of their rent free period, UITF 28
adjustments (£10.6 million), reduced back rents (£7.1 million) and sales
of properties (£10.4 million).
British Land’s share of joint venture operating profits decreased
by 26.9% to £67.5 million (2003: £92.3 million). This reflects the active
property disposal programme in the joint ventures, and the consolidation
of former joint ventures.
Profit before tax increased by £11.7million (6.7%) to £186.0 million
(2003: £174.3 million). Profits on disposal of fixed assets and property
trading increased by £12.2 million (45.7%) to £38.9 million (2003:
£26.7 million). Excluding these items underlying profits before tax
decreased slightly to £147.1 million (2003: £147.6 million).
Adjusted earnings per share have increased by 9.4 pence per share
to 37.0 pence per share (2003: 27.6 pence per share) and on a diluted
basis by 9.0 pence per share to 36.3 pence per share (2003: 27.3 pence
per share). Earnings per share were 35.1 pence per share (2003:
27.4 pence per share) and on a diluted basis 34.5 pence per share
(2003: 27.1 pence per share).
Taxation
The Group taxation charge comprises a current year corporation tax
charge of £17.5 million, deferred tax of £5.7 million and £9.2 million
attributable to joint ventures, equivalent to a current year charge of 17.4%
(2003: 15.3%) compared to a prevailing corporation tax rate of 30%. The
total charge has been decreased by £17.9 million in respect of items
relating to earlier periods (2003: increased by £7.0 million). The overall
tax charge of £14.5 million (2003: £33.7million) represents a tax rate of
7.8% (2003: 19.3%).
The tax which would arise on the disposal of properties and
investments at the amount at which they are carried in the balance
sheet, and including trading and development surpluses, is estimated at
£570 million (2003: £470 million), after taking account of available losses
and provisions.
Net rental income*
year ended 31 March
£m
 * including share of joint ventures
d
Underlying profit before tax
year ended 31 March
£m
d
Back to top
Net asset value per share†
as at 31 March
pence

†adjusted, diluted
d
Dividends per share
year ended 31 March
pence

d
Adjusted net assets
Adjusted net asset value includes the revaluation surplus on trading and
development properties and excludes deferred taxes provided on capital
allowances where no tax payment is expected to crystallise. Adjusted net
asset value increased by £564.8 million (13.1%) to £4,877.3 million
(2003: £4,312.5 million) reflecting the £467.9 million valuation surplus
in the year and £100.7million retained earnings.
Adjusted net asset value per share (diluted) increased by 12.5%
(107 pence). The key drivers in the increase in adjusted diluted net
assets per share included retained earnings (19 pence) and revaluation
surpluses (90 pence).
Income
Current annualised net rents, including our share of joint ventures,
amount to £567.7million. This rental income is supported by long leases
to strong covenants with regular upward only rent reviews.
- The average unexpired lease term within the portfolio is 17.0 years
with 79.2% of the rent roll remaining in place until 2014 (ten years).
Assuming break clauses are exercised at the earliest date this
average is still 15.8 years with 72.1% of the current rent roll remaining
in place in ten years time.
- Income quality has been measured by Investment Property
Databank (IPD) (using a Dun and Bradstreet Stress Score) and shows
91.8% of our rent roll is derived from negligible, low and low/medium
risk covenants (2003: 88.1%) with only 2.1% from high risk
covenants (2003: 2.2%).
- Reversionary income from investment properties and rental income
from committed developments are currently estimated at a further
£103.1million within five years, of which £49.1million is contracted
through pre-lets or the expiry of rent-free periods and minimum
rental uplifts.
Back to top
Rental income profile (assuming no rental value growth)
as at 31 March 2004 £m


* No rental value growth is assumed.
† includes rent reviews, letting of vacant space and expiry of rent free periods
(as determined by external valuers).
The graph provides a snapshot of committed income and estimated income based on
ERV at 31 March 2004, including our share of joint ventures. Upward only rent reviews
across the portfolio protect rental income from falling below passing rent (prior to
expiry/break). In addition, no account is taken of future acquisitions, disposals,
expenditures or other events. Rental income will be affected by such transactions and
future opportunities; the graph is not a forecast.
Annualised net rents are gross rents plus, where rent reviews are outstanding, any
increases to estimated rental value (as determined by the Group’s external valuers), less
any ground rents payable under head leases.
Finance and capital structure
Approximately 50% of the value of the Group’s property and investments
is financed by borrowings. British Land uses debt as a means of
maximising equity returns and minimising tax leakage. The Group
mortgage ratio at 31 March 2004 was 48% (2003: 49%). The mortgage
ratio including our share of joint ventures net debt (which totals
£529.8 million, without recourse to the Group) is 51% (2003: 52%).
British Land uses a variety of methods to finance property assets
with the aim of employing the most capital efficient method for each
asset’s particular characteristics. Financing is raised through a mixture of
securitisations, public and private debt issues, convertible bonds and
bank borrowings.
The Group’s financial risk management policy is to maintain
approximately 85% of debt at fixed and capped rates and debt is taken
out under long term facilities to balance the Group’s income profile from
long lease lengths. These policies concentrate economic exposure to
the property market and our portfolio’s performance and minimise
exposure to short- to medium-term interest rate movements. The Group
borrows fixed and floating rate debt and uses derivatives to produce the
desired interest rate profile.
| Financing statistics (Group) |
|
31 March 2004 |
|
31 March 2003 |
|
| Net debt |
|
£4,866.8m |
|
£4,361.4m |
| Weighted average debt maturity |
|
16.9 years |
|
18.0 years |
| Weighted average interest rate |
|
6.38% |
|
6.31% |
| % of net debt at fixed/capped interest rates |
|
84% |
|
83% |
| % of debt ringfenced with no recourse to other Group companies/assets |
|
64% |
|
64% |
| Interest cover (net rents/net interest) |
|
1.55x |
|
1.61x |
| Cash and available committed bank facilities, |
|
£2,149.6m |
|
£1,635.4m |
| of which drawn |
|
£1,011.0m |
|
£899.0m |
|
Back to top
At 31 March 2004 net debt is £4,866.8 million (2003: £4,361.4 million).
The joint ventures are separately financed with no recourse to British
Land (2003: guarantees totalling £12 million).
The Group’s weighted average interest cost is 6.38% (2003: 6.31%).
At 31 March 2004 84% of debt was at fixed or capped rates of
interest (2003: 83%) with a weighted average debt maturity of 16.9 years
(2003: 18.0 years). Interest cover is 1.55 times (net rents/net interest)
(2003: 1.61 times).
The market value of net debt and derivatives (including British Land’s
share of joint ventures) was £499.2million (before tax relief) greater than
their book values. This compares to £527.3 million (before tax relief) last
year, the reduction resulting principally from a combination of higher
underlying market interest rates and lower credit spreads.
The Group continues to maintain a significant level of committed
undrawn bank facilities to enable it to respond rapidly to opportunities
in the market and to fund developments without the need for project
specific financing.
Changes in financing
Securitisations
On 14 April 2003 the Group issued a further £50 million of Notes
securitising the rental income stream from Meadowhall. This is in
addition to the £825 million of Notes issued in December 2001. The
weighted average interest rate of the issues is 5.5% per annum and
the weighted average maturity is currently 19.4 years.
On 7 July 2003 the Group paid £73.5 million to redeem the
outstanding Class D Fixed/Floating Rate Unsecured Notes 2014 issued
as part of the Broadgate Securitisation. These Notes, which had a
coupon of 7.1107% and a weighted average maturity of less than two
years, were redeemed at a premium of £1.7 million.
On 6 October 2003 the Group issued a further £75.5 million of
Notes securitising the rental income stream of certain Sainsbury’s
supermarkets raising proceeds of £84 million at an effective rate of 5.8%
per annum. The weighted average interest rate of the total issue is 6.77%
per annum. The current weighted average maturity is 14.7 years.
US Dollar Private Placement 2015
On 3 October 2003 British Land issued US$154 million 6.30% Senior
Notes due 2015 as a further US private placement to institutional debt
investors. A cross-currency swap was simultaneously executed,
effectively converting the issue into Sterling at a fixed rate of 5.999%
per annum for the term.
Dividends
The Directors propose a final dividend of 10.07 pence per share, making
a total dividend of 14.5 pence, an increase of 8.2% over 2003. This
increase is in line with our continuing policy of dividend growth. The total
dividend is covered 2.4 times by profits for the year.
Cash flow
Profits after interest, tax and working capital movements, generated a
positive operating cash flow for the year of £163.1million (2003: £95.0
million). Property and investment disposals by the Group and cash
returns from joint ventures realised cash of £281.3 million. Property
acquisitions, developments and investment expenditure by the Group
amounted to £466.9 million.
REITS
On 17 March 2004 the Government issued a consultation paper related
to the potential introduction of a tax transparent property vehicle (REIT) in
the UK. The Group is actively involved in this consultation process both
directly with the Government and also through industry bodies such
as the BPF. In principle the Group supports the introduction of a tax
transparent property vehicle and believes such a vehicle would be
beneficial to investors in property. Whilst the consultation process takes
place the Group is seeking to be as flexible as possible in respect of its
financing policy.
Back to top
Accessing a flexible pool of finance

* Floating rate bonds with related fixed rate swaps.
d
Accounting issues
International Accounting Standards (IAS) will be applied, as required
for all European Union listed companies, for our financial year ending
31 March 2006. The Group continues its preparations, which include
changes to systems and methodologies, and will give further guidance
on the accounting impact in due course.
The underlying performance of the business including cash flows
will, of course, be unaffected. The reported results will however look
significantly different and the accounting net asset value will be
significantly lower than that shown under the Group’s existing accounting
policies. The five major areas identified to date where IAS differs from UK
GAAP affecting British Land are as follows:
- UK GAAP does not permit deferred tax to be recognised where a
business is not obliged to pay more tax at a future date. IAS on
the other hand requires provision for all taxable and deductible
differences between book values for tax purposes and accounting
book values that are not ‘permanent’ timing differences. The effect
of this change will be to reduce net assets.
The most significant such difference for British Land are the base
costs for tax purposes of its properties and investments, including
shares in joint ventures, and the accounting book values which
include material revaluation adjustments. Tax payments will arise only
if British Land sells those assets and the amount of tax crystallised
will reflect the price received at the time, the structure of the
transaction, any tax benefits available such as loss relief and benefits
derived from the tax position of the purchaser or of the Group at that
time. None of these mitigating factors are accurately quantifiable
where no transaction is in contemplation and negotiation,
accordingly the provision to be booked under IAS will not represent
an amount which the company expects to pay. IAS does not permit
the deferred tax provision to be discounted to present value.
The disclosures in note 7 to the financial statements show the
calculation of the tax payable assuming all properties and
investments are sold at the amount at which they are carried in the
balance sheet, including trading and development surpluses but
without regard to future events or tax planning.
- The definitions of finance and operating leases are different between
UK GAAP and IAS. Most of the Group’s leases will be unaffected. In
the case of head leases on the Group’s leasehold properties, IAS will
require a financial liability and corresponding asset to be recognised
in the balance sheet. Currently the financial effect of head leases is
reflected by our valuers as a reduction from their valuations. The net
asset effect of this change is not expected to be material.
- British Land uses derivatives to manage its interest rate risk. A
description of financing policy and risk management is shown in the section Business Opportunity and Business Risk Management. In accordance with UK GAAP British Land’s derivatives are
not valued when they are hedges and any income or costs are
recognised in the profit and loss account consistently with the
underlying hedged transaction. IAS requires all derivatives to be
carried at their fair values in the balance sheet and, where the related
debt is not carried at market value, this could reduce or increase reported net assets. Hedge accounting whereby profits and losses
are matched with those of the underlying (instrument or) cash flow is
subject to restrictive tests under IAS and as a result there may be
more earnings volatility. The European Union has yet to ratify the use
of the International Financial Reporting Standard covering hedge
accounting (IAS 39) and there is uncertainty whether amendments
may arise to IAS 39 as a result of the ratification process.
- Unlike UK GAAP which requires proposed final dividends to be
accrued, IAS only permits recognition of the liability to pay a final
dividend when this has been approved by the shareholders. This will
lead to an increase in net asset value.
- IAS will require a portion of the Group’s irredeemable convertible
bonds to be recognised as equity. This will lead to an increase in net
asset value.
In preparation for IAS the Group has fully adopted Financial Reporting
Standard (FRS 17) ‘Retirement Benefits’ and chosen early adoption of
Financial Reporting Standard (FRS 20) ‘Share-based payment’. Adoption
of these UK Accounting Standards is expected to result in substantially
the same accounting treatment as that which will be required upon
adoption of IAS.
The impact of the adoption of FRS 17 is to decrease profit before
tax by £1.0 million (2003: increase £1.9 million). The Group has recorded
a net pension asset of £0.1 million at 31 March 2004 (2003: liability
£6.0 million) which represents only 0.002% of the Group’s adjusted
net assets, reflecting the Group’s small employee numbers and
payroll costs.
FRS 20 requires the fair value of equity-settled share based
payments to be determined at the date of grant and for this fair value
to be expensed over the vesting period. The impact of the adoption of
FRS 20 is immaterial and hence no prior year adjustment is necessary.
Canary Wharf
The Group is a member of the consortium which has formed Songbird
Estates PLC (‘Songbird’) to acquire Canary Wharf Group PLC (‘Canary’).
On 21 May 2004 Songbird declared its offer for Canary unconditional in
all respects having received valid acceptances from, or contracted
to acquire, 60.9% of Canary’s existing issued share capital. British Land
will own between 14.1% and 16.4% of Songbird (assuming 100%
acceptances) – the exact percentage is dependent upon the eventual
level of acceptances by Canary shareholders and whether they accept
any of their consideration in the form of Songbird shares.
On completion the investment in Songbird will be accounted for as
a fixed asset investment at directors’ valuation in accordance with the
Group’s accounting policies.

Graham Roberts Finance Director
24 May 2004
Back to top
|
 |