The Remuneration Committee throughout the year consisted of: Sir Derek Higgs, Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, Lord Burns, Dr Christopher Gibson-Smith and David Michels.
The Remuneration Committee took advice during the year from Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow, John Ritblat, Stephen Hester and John Weston Smith. The Remuneration Committee appointed Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow as adviser to the Committee. In addition Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow acts as actuary to the British Land Group Final Salary Pension Scheme and gives advice on share scheme and personnel policy matters to the Company. The Committee has considered the potential conflict of interest and believes there is no conflict and continues to monitor this position.
Directors’ remuneration packages consist of several components. The fixed part of the package is a combination of basic salary and benefits. In addition, the Company has an annual incentive plan and a long-term incentive plan. The policy is tailored to support the strategic objective of delivering long-term value to shareholders.
i Basic salary and benefits
Basic salary and benefits in kind for each executive director are reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee and take into account individual responsibility, experience and performance as well as the marketplace for similar positions in other companies. In reviewing the cash compensation packages of the executive directors, the Remuneration Committee commissioned an independent survey of comparative packages of directors in companies of similar size and industry as British Land. Salary is not increased automatically in line with market rates and the Remuneration Committee considers in respect of each director whether to change the existing positioning in response to changes in job/relative value to British Land, personal performance, reassessment of market pressures and seniority. Benefits normally include the provision of a car, fuel, private medical insurance and permanent health insurance. Pensions are provided under approved and unapproved schemes. The aim has been to provide executives with at least 20 years’ service at age 60 with benefits equivalent to a pension at that age of two-thirds of basic salary less the single person’s basic state pension.
ii Annual incentive plan
The annual incentive plan consists of a cash bonus payable to executive directors reflecting the individual’s contribution to the Company during the preceding year and team performance.
The target award level for the Chief Executive is 65% of fixed salary for 2004 (pro rata) and 2005, increasing to 75% for 2006 and thereafter. The normal maximum award shall be 100% of fixed salary. Target award levels for the other executive directors are 40% of base salary for above satisfactory performance and 75% of salary for outstanding performance.
The awards are not contractual and are not pensionable.
The Remuneration Committee’s approach is two-fold. It considers each individual’s performance in regard to the specific areas of responsibility, such as:
The Committee also considers team contributions made by each individual to overall corporate performance, using as external indicators:
The Committee will be considering the introduction of a deferred annual bonus plan to be put to shareholders at the 2006 Annual General Meeting.
iii Long-term incentives
The Long-Term Incentive Plan, approved by shareholders in 2003, following consultation by shareholders facilitated by the Association of British Insurers, permits either market value options or performance shares, which are similar to restricted shares, to be awarded, as may suit the Company from time to time. The option section of the Plan comprises an Inland Revenue approved part and an unapproved part. The Company has been advised that options have a present value equivalent to approximately one-third of the value of performance shares. This may be varied at the Remuneration Committee’s discretion in the light of changing market conditions. Under the Plan, the Company may award a maximum notional value of 150% of base salary in performance shares each year or the equivalent value of base salary in options each year (the latter under current estimations being option grants over shares worth 450% of base salary). The annual limit will be set under both the options and performance shares components of the Plan taken together. At least one-third of any award made each year will consist of each of performance shares and options.
Grants made under the Plan are subject to a prescribed performance condition upon which the exercise of options and the vesting of performance shares will be contingent except that grants may be made without any performance condition to facilitate the recruitment of a new executive.
The performance condition attaching to options and share awards measures the growth in the Company’s net asset value per share against the capital growth component of the Investment Property Databank Annual Index, over a performance period of three years commencing the year in which the options and share awards are granted. Growth in the Company’s net asset value per share must exceed that of the Index for a minimum proportion of the options to be exercised and/or performance shares to vest. The Company is geared while the index is not and therefore stretching out-performance is required for the entire award to vest. Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow undertakes the measurement of performance and submits a report to the Company showing the results for each specific award.
| The performance hurdles are: | |
|---|---|
| Percentage by which the average annual growth of British Land’s Net Asset Value per share exceeds the average annual increase in the capital growth component of the Investment Property Databank Annual Index |
Percentage vesting |
| 5% or more | 100% |
| 4% or more but less than 5% | 80% |
| 3% or more but less than 4% | 60% |
| 2% or more but less than 3% | 40% |
| 1% or more but less than 2% | 20% |
| More than 0% but less than 1% | 10% |
| 0% or less | 0% |
The Committee reviews these performance conditions on a regular basis to ensure they are both sufficiently stretching and remain relevant to the Company’s strategic objectives.
In connection with the potential introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts into the UK, the Remuneration Committee will consider changes to the Group’s Long-Term Incentive Plan including whether share options remain a valuable part of the package and whether to exchange existing options outstanding for equivalent value performance shares should British Land propose to convert to REIT status. Any such changes would be subject to the consent of shareholders and option holders.
The long-term incentive plans that have been used in the past are an Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) and a Restricted Share Plan (RSP). No further awards will be made under the ESOS or the RSP, following the adoption of the new Long-Term Incentive Plan by shareholders at the 2003 Annual General Meeting.
Under the ESOS, market value options were granted at the discretion of the Committee. Options became exercisable after three years (or five years in certain cases), dependent on the performance target being met. The performance target, agreed following consultation with the Association of British Insurers and the National Association of Pension Funds, required growth in net asset value per share over a rolling three year period equal to or exceeding the growth in the capital growth component of the Investment Property Databank Annual Index. No options have been granted under this scheme since 1996.
Under the RSP, executives and directors were granted provisional interests in securities of the Company that vest according to performance against a target, agreed following consultation with the Association of British Insurers and the National Association of Pension Funds. This target requires growth in net asset value per share over a rolling three year period equal to or exceeding the growth in the capital growth component of the Investment Property Databank Annual Index. No awards have been made under this scheme since 2003. There is a stepped incentive scale in bands of achievement as follows:
| Percentage by which the average annual growth of British Land’s Net Asset Value per share exceeds the average annual increase in the capital growth component of the Investment Property Databank Annual Index |
Relevant percentage to be applied to number of ordinary shares provisionally granted |
|---|---|
| 5% or more | 150% |
| 4% or more but less than 5% | 125% |
| 3% or more but less than 4% | 100% |
| 2% or more but less than 3% | 75% |
| 1% or more but less than 2% | 50% |
| 0% or more but less than 1% | 25% |
| Less than 0% | 0% |
The following summarises the annual package and relative importance for an index base salary of 100 for each executive director.
| Chief Executive | |
|---|---|
| Salary | 100 |
| Benefits | 5 |
| Bonus | up to 65–100 |
| Other executive directors | |
|---|---|
| Salary | 100 |
| Benefits | 10 |
| Bonuses | up to 40–75 |
In addition annual grants under the Long-Term Incentive Plan are targeted at 100 –150.
John Ritblat is non-executive Chairman of Colliers CRE PLC and retained earnings from that position of £66,398 for the year to 31 December 2004 (2003: £63,506).
The graph below is prepared in accordance with The Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002. It shows the Company’s total return and that of the FTSE Real Estate SectorTotal Return Index for the five years from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2005.
The FTSE Real Estate Sector Index was chosen because that is where the shares of the Company are classified. Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow prepared the graph based on underlying data provided by Datastream.
The British Land Company PLC Total Return Index vs. FTSE Real Estate Sector Total Return Index for the period 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2005 (rebased 1 April 2000) |
|
The policy of the Company is to have service contracts with notice periods of one year. It is sometimes necessary when recruiting a new director to give a service contract with an initial term of longer than one year. In such circumstances it is the policy of the Company that the notice period should reduce to one year after an initial period of service.
The Company applies the principle of mitigation in the event of early termination of service contracts.
Stephen Hester has a service contract dated 26 July 2004, relating to service beginning on 12 November 2004, which provides for one year’s notice to expire on or at any time after 12 November 2006.
John Ritblat, John Weston Smith and Robert Bowden do not have service contracts with the Company, as they have reached age 60. There are no arrangements in place for compensation in respect of salary, annual bonus and benefits in kind in the event of termination of these individuals’ employment.
Nicholas Ritblat has a service contract dated 12 November 1991 as amended by side letters dated 9 June 1997 and 29 May 2002. It is a rolling contract providing for one year’s notice.
Graham Roberts joined the Company in January 2002 as an executive director under a service contract dated 19 November 2001. It is a rolling contract providing for one year’s notice.
There are no further provisions for compensation payable on termination of service contracts of directors. There has been no compensation paid to departing directors during the year.
The divisions of responsibilities between the Chairman and Chief Executive, prepared in accordance with the provisions and good practice guidelines of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance, have been set out in writing and approved by the Board. This includes the transitional arrangements. It is not intended that John Ritblat will participate in any future grants under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. It is intended that his salary for the year to 31 March 2006 will reflect the transition to the Chairman role.
The remuneration of the non-executive directors is a matter for the executive members of the Board. Their remuneration comprises a standard director’s fee, a fee for additional responsibilities and an attendance fee based on the number of meetings attended during the year. The remuneration provided takes into account the level of responsibility, experience and abilities required and the marketplace for similar positions in comparable companies.
Audited informationView the table showing the Directors' Emoluments
View the table showing beneficial interests of the directors in the share and loan capital of the Company.
View the table showing beneficial interests of the directors under the Company’s 1984 Share Option Scheme in ordinary shares of the Company.
View the table showing beneficial interests of the directors under the Company’s Sharesave Scheme in ordinary shares of the Company.
View the table showing beneficial interests of the directors under the Company’s Restricted Share Plan in the ordinary shares of the Company.
Upon vesting, shares are transferred out of the British Land Share Ownership Plan (the Trust), a discretionary trust established to facilitate the operation of the incentive schemes. The trustees of the Trust purchase the Company’s ordinary shares in the open market and rights to dividends on shares held by the Trust are payable in accordance with their awards to employees participating in the Company’s Restricted Share Plan.
View the table showing beneficial interests of the directors under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan in the ordinary shares of the Company.
Upon vesting, performance shares are transferred out of the Trust. The trustees of the Trust purchase the Company’s ordinary shares in the open market and rights to dividends on shares held by the Trust, are retained by the Trust and are payable to employees only on the vesting of the employees’ performance shares.
In connection with the recruitment of Stephen Hester and to compensate him for loss of previous benefits the Company has made one-off grants as follows:
Co-Investment Share Plan – On 29 November 2004, Stephen Hester was awarded 61,957 shares under the Co-Investment Share Plan. These shares conditionally vest on their third anniversary of grant provided he remains in employment. This award was conditional on the prior acquisition by Stephen Hester of a matching number of shares and requires those shares’ subsequent retention for a three year period.
Recruitment Award Agreement – On 29 November 2004, Stephen Hester was awarded 36,671 shares which vest one year after joining the Company, provided that he remains in employment.
Two executive directors, Nicholas Ritblat and Graham Roberts, earned pension benefits in schemes sponsored by the Company during the year. Stephen Hester receives a sum equal to 35% of his basic salary in lieu of pension contributions. For the period from joining to 31March 2005 this amounted to £80,649.
Graham Roberts’ benefits from the tax-approved scheme are restricted and he is therefore entitled to benefit from the Company’s Funded Unapproved Retirement Benefit Scheme (FURBS). The benefits provided by the FURBS are defined lump sums.
Pension related payments have been made in the year to Graham Roberts and Robert Bowden to meet income tax liabilities in respect of contributions to their FURBS arrangements. The payment to Graham Roberts was £387,421 (2004: £nil) in respect of entitlements accruing in the three years to 31 March 2005. The payment to Robert Bowden was £179,288 (2004: £nil) in respect of entitlements accrued in the two years to 31 March 2004. (Robert Bowden retired from the FURBS scheme in the year to 31 March 2004 and so has accrued no further entitlements since then).
Non-executive directors do not participate in any Company sponsored pension arrangement.
Since the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002 came into force, company accounts are subject to two sets of disclosure requirements in relation to directors’ pensions rather than one. The extended Companies Act 1985 requirements have to be observed in addition to, not in place of, the current UK Listing Authority requirements. The requirements differ slightly and these Regulations are expected to remain in force for the time being. The tables shown below provide the details of directors’ pensions necessary to satisfy the two sets of requirements.
View the table showing the Companies Act 1985 Disclosure Requirements.
This report was approved by the Board on 24 May 2005.
Sir Derek Higgs Chairman of the Remuneration Committee